<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Watermarking on Steve Hatch&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://www.hatch.org/tags/watermarking/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Watermarking on Steve Hatch&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.hatch.org/tags/watermarking/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Fingerprinting AI Art Is the New Biz Markie Ruling</title>
      <link>https://www.hatch.org/2026/08/13/fingerprinting-ai-art-is-the-new-biz-markie-ruling/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.hatch.org/2026/08/13/fingerprinting-ai-art-is-the-new-biz-markie-ruling/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.hatch.org/images/fingerprinting-ai-art-is-the-new-biz-markie-ruling.png&#34; alt=&#34;Fingerprinting AI Art Is the New Biz Markie Ruling&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In 1991, a federal judge ruled that Biz Markie&amp;rsquo;s use of a Gilbert O&amp;rsquo;Sullivan sample was theft, full stop — and for the better part of a decade, hip-hop producers had to clear a sample before they could trust it wouldn&amp;rsquo;t end their career. The technique wasn&amp;rsquo;t illegal. But the presumption around it changed overnight, and the presumption did more damage than the ruling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
