<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Negotiation on Steve Hatch&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://www.hatch.org/tags/negotiation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Negotiation on Steve Hatch&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.hatch.org/tags/negotiation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Your Agent&#39;s Model Tier Is Your Purchasing Power</title>
      <link>https://www.hatch.org/2026/07/21/model-tier-purchasing-power/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.hatch.org/2026/07/21/model-tier-purchasing-power/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.hatch.org/images/model-tier-purchasing-power.png&#34; alt=&#34;Your Agent&amp;rsquo;s Model Tier Is Your Purchasing Power&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Your agent lost you money last week, rated the experience five stars, and you agreed with it.&lt;/strong&gt; That is not a bug in the agent. That is the entire shape of the market we just walked into. When a machine negotiates on your behalf and comes back with a worse deal than a better machine would have gotten, it does not return an error. It returns a plausible, satisfying, worse outcome — and then it tells you the deal was fair. And here is the cruelest part: you have no way to know it was wrong, because you never see the deal you didn&amp;rsquo;t get.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
