This is the unfortunate result of the “every growing uphill battle with SPAM”, but apparently an email to me from Anders Jacobsen was rejected due to some of the drastic, but efficient, measures John has been applying to the server.

Anders brings up some interesting points, in that the automated rejection notices, from legitimate senders, present themselves as bad-mannered netiquette that penetrates the social fabric of the online world.

As I said in my response to Anders, “SPAM has effectively transformed an efficient means of communication into a bastion of nonsense.”

Blah! I’m going home!

Related Posts

  • SpamNet: New spam filtering -- For the past few hours I've been using Cloudmark's new P2P based spam filter plug-in for Outlook  and so far so good. In addition to my own simple home grown server-based phrase matching spam filter, I've only had one bogus message...
  • Stopping spam with the Anti-Spam-SMTP-Proxy -- This seems like a smart approach: Stop spam at the SMTP-level with Whitelists and Bayesian filtering using the Anti-Spam-SMTP-Proxy (ASSP): “The Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy (ASSP) Server project aims to create an open source platform-independent SMTP Proxy server which implements whitelists...
  • A Plan for Spam -- Paul Graham has A Plan for Spam … "I think it's possible to stop spam, and that content-based filters are the way to do it." Sounds good to me! ...
  • AOL Spam Fighter, Spammer or Both? -- Even though I applaud AOL’s recent Spam lawsuits, catbird points out the irony: “As much as I detest spam, I am having trouble cheering for a company that sends me unsolicited CDs in expensive and non-biodegradable tin cases every month....
  • Spam Blocking Email Addresses -- Need a quick throw-away email address for an online registration? Give Mailinator a try. Interesting idea to combat spam. ...
  • Blogging complements the water-cooler -- Anders Jacobsen, whose blog I have just started to read on a regular bases (due to his comments here that I still need to respond too), has some rather compelling posts about KM and blogging, like for example this response...
  • Spam-Free Universal Inbox via MailBlocks -- Allegedly for $10 per year, Mailblocks Eliminates Spam “and offers the powerful features you want in your web mail.” According to Kevin it’s brought to you by Phil Goldman, who is one of the founders of WebTV. ...



One Comment to “SPAM false-positives can be rude”

  1. Anders | July 3rd, 2003 at 8:07 am

    No worries, Steve; no offense taken… I think I was just intrigued why I’d been blocked…

    Looks like converseing via blog comments will be our best bet until we bother implementing email challenge/response mechanisms and white-lists to limit the daily inbox-flooding…

    Sad but true; these spamming bastards have to a large extent ruined the once useful tool of email…